Results EpanetMSX


#1

Hi!

When comparing resultfiles from EMT and epanetMSX run from command prompt I have discovered that some simulations give different results. Simulations run on a small networks give the same results, but simulations run on the network I am interested in gives different results. I have attached a file with an example. My network has got 827 nodes and 880 links.

What could be the reason for these differences?

Thanks in advance


#2

This is not clear. Can you please provide a basic example in order to try and repeat your issue?

Thanks

demetrs


#3

Thanks for the quick response.

I have run the example networks which are provided with the EMT.
Results for the following networks are equal: “As5Adsorb”, “Batch-NH2CL”,“Net2-CL” and “Net3-NH2CL” . I have also tried creating a basic example to repeat the issue, but so far I have not been successfull. I still have issues when running simulations of the network I am interested in.


#4

Hi

It seems like I have managed to find a possible explanation for the challenge that I have been experiencing. When comparing the INP input file with the temporary INP file I see that rules are not read. If I have understood things corretly ENgetcontrol is used to get controls from the input file. Does it only work for " Simple controls"? My controls are “rule-based controls”.

Thanks for the help.

Malcolm


#5

Hi Malcom,

What you are saying is that the Rule-based controls are not copied in the temporary input file? This could be the problem.

@Mariosmsk let’s check this issue.

@MTH, if you have a minimum example to share with the code and a reduced network, this would be great!

Demetris


#6

Hi

Yes, that is my impression.

I will see what I can manage to sort out.

Thanks for the help.

Malcolm